In the studies summarized by professor John Hattie, the term ‘active learning’ means involving students practicing important skills and in applying new knowledge. Lessons usually contained the following elements:
Reviews of previous learning
Showing how: the teacher showing how to do it, explaining this, and thinking out loud to show the process.
Controlled practice: where the class do it as a class, or as individuals, but the teacher checks closely and continually to decide whether students are ready for individual work. The meaning of the work is stressed as are the process: how they should do it; and the product: what they should create.
Students doing it themselves individually: this is the heart of it of course.
Students work being checked: this includes the students checking their own and each other’s work. This takes place during the lesson, and as soon as possible.
Homework: assignments of about 15 minutes including some review questions.
Structured reviews: reviews at the end of the lesson asking students ‘what have we learned?’ and agreeing and summarizing this. Reviews at the beginning of every lesson to review the last. Reviews each week and each month to review previous topics.
This version of active learning is called ‘direct instruction’ - a misleading name as it is so active!

Professor Hattie found using careful statistical methods that on average, active learning adds a grade and a half to achievement.

Well, if Active Learning works, why don’t more teachers use it?
• We tend to teach the way we were taught ourselves, rather than in the way that works best.
• We know too much, and rather enjoy explaining. So when you set activities, listen carefully to learners as they work, this can be even more enjoyable and less hard work than explaining, and the feedback is very informative.





An interesting demonstration about consumerism and its global effects over our environment and us.
A bit lengthy (21 min.) but I highly recommend it!


Crayon Physics is a 2D physics puzzle / sandbox game, in which you get to experience what it would be like if your drawings would be magically transformed into real physical objects. Solve puzzles with your artistic vision and creative use of physics.

I try to:

-get to know well the level of the group (class)

-adapt the lessons to learner’s comprehension level

-put accent on understanding, not mechanical learning

-Not teach and teach… Teach – then get feedback! And let the feedback affect what you do or say next:
a) don’t proceed forward until the majority of learners in the class are comfortable with the subject;
b) in my opinion the success of a lesson depends on the learners feedback;
c) I evaluate myself based on students feedback (if I realize that something goes wrong, I will try to find eventual mistakes: maybe my expectations were too high, maybe the methods used were inadequate, maybe I didn’t use the right tools, etc.)

-Not chalk and talk! :)

Another observation of mine is that kids from this generation don’t know how to play.
Would it be a good idea to introduce organized play activities in schools? In my opinion it would stop disputes, fighting, getting lonely or/and bored...

The 3 core teacher characteristics after Carl Rogers, American psychologist, are:
-respect (a positive and non-judgmental regard for another person)

-empathy (being able to see things from the other person’s perspective, as if looking through their eyes)

-authenticity (being oneself without hiding behind job titles, roles or masks)

→ the educational climate becomes more positive

→ fear of taking risks or facing challenges diminishes

In doing this, they increase their own self-esteem and self-understanding, gradually taking more and more of the responsibility for their own learning themselves rather than assuming that it is someone else’s job.

Authenticity is the most important of all 3 because is the foundation of rapport.
Take the risk of being yourself, human, vulnerable, honest! Students respond the way you respond to them.

As a teacher, I cannot learn for my students. The more I do myself, the less space there will be for the learners to do things. What I can do is help create the conditions in which they might be able to learn. This could be by involving them, enabling them to work at their own speed, by not giving long explanations, by encouraging them to participate, talk, interact, do things, etc.

It’s OK for students to make mistakes, to try things out and get things wrong and learn from that.

One of the biggest problems I faced as a physics teacher, was that 90% of the learners pure and simple refuse to think. They never felt the joy finding a solution to a physics or math problem after couple of hours or maybe days of thinking and investigation. My main goal is to convince them that if having a healthy body means physical exercise, then a healthy brain needs exercise for keeping it in a good shape too. So I use most of the time active learning methods like scientific inquiry, experiment, guided discovery (what’s your theory?), demonstration, discussion groups, field trips, and outdoor learning. It’s obvious that the aforementioned methods are accomplished through constant dialogue with pupils and this means continuous feedback to me as well as a reliable formative evaluation method.

For better illustration and understanding of abstract/difficult things I prefer to use computer aided learning techniques (educational software, simulations, animations, pictures, multimedia, Internet). In my experience the use of modern tools and methods yields to much better recalled, enjoyed and understood lessons.

Share/Save/Bookmark

About this blog

Thoughts, ideas, opinions, facts... Mainly, but not exclusively about teaching and learning physics, nature and natural sciences.

Tag Cloud